RESUMO
In upper extremity peripheral nerve injuries, orthotic intervention has been used as a valuable device to restore function. However, there is lacking evidence to support it. The purpose of this study was to explore the application of body function's outcome measures for orthotic intervention evaluation in patients with peripheral nerve injury. Two participants sustaining a peripheral nerve injury who underwent orthotic intervention were assessed: subject 1 was a 25-year-old man with ulnar and median nerve injury presenting with a composite claw; subject 2, a 28-year-old man with radial nerve injury presenting with a dropped wrist. Strength, range of motion, and electromyography were measured in 2 conditions: wearing the orthosis and without it. The Jamar, Pinch Gauge, a 3D motion capture system (Optitrack-NaturalPoint), and surface electromyography (Trigno Wireless System, Delsys) were the chosen instruments. Both subjects presented differences in grip and pinch strength. In both tasks, subject 1 reached higher wrist extension while wearing the orthosis. Subject 2 reached higher wrist extension and radial deviation while wearing the orthosis. There were marked differences in both tasks for subject 2, especially the maintenance of wrist extension when wearing the orthosis. Electromyographic assessment showed higher root-mean-square values for all muscles, in both tasks for subject 1. For subject 2, a higher root-mean-square value was found for flexor carpi ulnaris during the execution of task 1 wearing the orthosis. Outcome measures of body function can quantify the impact of orthotic intervention in patients sustaining peripheral nerve injury, and therefore, they are feasible for evaluating it.
